Cem Ilkel vs Romain Faucon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
L L W L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Faucon
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Faucon winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Faucon was at the M15 Pretoria, 22-02-2025, Second, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Romain Faucon | 0 |
M15 Pretoria(22-02-2025)
6
4
6
3
| Ilkel | Stats | Faucon |
|---|---|---|
| 78% (29-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (5-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 574 | Ranking | N/A |
| 144 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (437-334) | Career Total W/L | 48% (94-102) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Romain Faucon
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:4:10 | Average Match Time | 2:4:10 |
| 47% (26/55) | 1st Serve % | 50% (33/66) |
| 88% (23/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 62% (18/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (29/66) | Return Points Win % | 25% (14/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Romain Faucon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 5-7 6-3 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Marionneau
Player
Romain Faucon
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Markus Molder
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Evan Jarzaguet
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Romain Faucon
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Pranav Karthik
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Romain Faucon
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Alexey Aleshchev
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Rosenzweig
Player
Romain Faucon
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 15-13 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Slavic
Player
Romain Faucon
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (437/334) | Win/Loss | 48% (94/102) |
| 55% (976/807) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (217/221) |
| 52% (8747/8216) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2119/2116) |
| 62% (287/178) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (46/50) |
| 45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (20/32) |
| 55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (28/19) |
| 10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2840 | Aces Total | 598 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1378 | Total Double Faults | 392 |
| 1:14:59 | Average Match Time | 1:7:55 |
| 203.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 274.35 |
| 58% (23978/41029) | 1st Serve % | 58% (4892/8422) |
| 70% (16866/23978) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3290/4892) |
| 51% (8703/17051) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1634/3529) |
| 40% (1616/3998) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (342/793) |
| 39% (16139/41486) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3295/8399) |
| 32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (241/121) | Futures W/L | 48% (94/102) |
| 57% (425/752) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (93/192) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (25/45) |
| 56% (130/232) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (20/50) |
| 85% (423/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (102/85) |
| 14% (423/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (102/16) |
| 21% (347/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (94/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
